Character Sketch: Jack Merridew Essay
Stories through history argue that evil tendencies are shown in early life. One character, Jack Merridew in Lord of the Flies by William Golding, is a perfect example. This young boy is the evolving antagonist who brings discord in his wake, and fundamentally undermines the representative society on the island. At the outset, he is seen as a plainly ugly redheaded child, only possessing his grandiose black cloak, but evolves into something more sinister. Jack’s actions are impulsive, but effective in moving his darker motives forward. He uses his following of other young boys as muscle, demonstrates his power, and corrupts the world of Lord of the Flies with his destructive behaviors. As well as demonstrating the characteristics of a harsh leader, Jack fits the description of evil under other descriptions. Jack is the character that moves the novel forward with his harsh words and conduct, as illustrated by his dominance, pride, and selfishness.
Dominance is a strong trait in Jack, showing this through his brash actions quickly. His character is introduced with a sense of authority. “The boy who controlled them [the choir] was dressed in the same way though his cap badge was golden.” Before one even knows Jack’s name, he is demonstrated to be the leader by wearing a color at a higher rank than the rest. Jack is the leader of his choir group of schoolboys, and frequently asserts his dominance by yelling at the young children to “stand still!” and follow his orders. Although he is merely a boy, he uses intimidation to achieve his power. At the outset, Jack boasts about how “I ought to be chief, because I'm chapter chorister and head boy. I can sing C sharp.” Jack thinks he should be at the head of the group, due to his singing voice, and simply because he has always had this kind of authority. His need for power is also a demonstration of his selfishness, as well as his dominance. Another example of his dominance is shown when Jack separates the two groups. “Listen all of you. Me and my hunters, we’re living along the beach by a flat rock. We hunt and feast and have fun. If you want to join my tribe come and see us. Perhaps I’ll let you join. Perhaps not,” he shouts. This back-and-forth is a form of manipulation. This desire to create another group and feast, away from the ones that attempt to oppress him, helps to show his neediness and power. Jack has the upper hand in this situation, on the grounds that he holds the idea of “fun” above the other boy’s heads in an attempt to create a more powerful image of himself. This kind of sinister manipulation is shown commonly in abusive relationships. He uses this form of manipulation in other ways: “You're no good on a job like this,” he tells Piggy. “We don’t want you.” He uses this degradation to get what he wants, not to be put down himself, and to be seen as the most powerful person in the group. Piggy is insecure about his abilities and Jack knows this. He uses this insecurity to assert his power,...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Lord of The Flies and Hitler’s Nazi Regime1280 words - 5 pages The 1954 novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding won the 1983 Nobel Prize for Literature and the novels allegorical nature has earned it positions in the “Modern Library 100 Best Novels, reaching number 41 on the editor's list, and 25 on the reader's list” (Lord of the Flies: Background). Golding’s thought provoking novel was written and published as the world was still remembering the horrors of the Second World War and many parts and...
Lord of the Flies - From Merridew to Savagery1113 words - 4 pages From Merridew to SavageryThe angels of God are perfect; they don't do anything significantly harmful. "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary" (Jackson Madison). If we were all angels, there would be no crime and no need for government. Our consciences' would not allow us to harm or break laws. Angels made by God were not...
lolll919 words - 4 pages Essay OrganizerIntroduction: HOOK:An Island paradise ruined. But who is to blame? Definition of Terms (if necessary) : BACKGROUND (Author(s), Title(s), Year(s) published, brief description or plot summary): Lord of the flies written by William Golding in 1954 this edition was published in 1988 published by faber and...
Character Analysis of Characte1123 words - 4 pages Character Analysis Many characters in the novel Lord of the Flies, changed as the story went on. The novel's author, William Golding, made the changes obvious with the things that the characters did. Ralph, Jack, Piggy and
The Lord of the flies679 words - 3 pages The Lord of the flyWilliam Golding was awarded the 1983 Nobel Prize in Literature"for his novels which, with the perspicuity of realistic narrative art and the diversity and universality of myth, illuminate the human condition in the world of today"During an unnamed...
The Genesis of Evil in Lord of the Flies1198 words - 5 pages For centuries, psychologists and psychoanalysts have studied humans in hopes of discovering a common link, a pattern per say, in what provokes their certain thoughts and actions. Many question certain values, morals, religion, even their brain chemistry, but nobody knows for certain. Sigmund Freud’s theory suggests that human actions/personalities derive from three parts of the human psyche; the id, ego and superego. William Golding analyzes this...
The Core Allegiance of our Being: Are we Essentially Good or Evil? Examples in Modern Culture1746 words - 7 pages When we are first born, as mere babies in our mothers arms, are we evil? Through reading The Lord of The Flies and learning about various tragic events in history, I have come to the conclusion that yes, humans are somewhat evil. Although, I believe that it is not our everyday educated and civil surroundings that make us this way, but our thoughts and experiences that bring out “the darkness of man’s heart” (Golding 202). “It is a man’s own mind,...
Lord of The Flies Dystopian Society1165 words - 5 pages Lord Of The Flies Dystopian Society EssayThe novel, 'Lord Of The Flies' written by William Golding is a timeless classic and one of the most significant works of 20th century literature. It can be interpreted as a novel with a simple plot, consisting of a group of boys who get stranded on a desert island who out of sheer boredom...
'Lord of the Flies" by William Golding.1880 words - 8 pages Lord of the Flies by William Golding - it is about the first chapter and the 3 main characters in it - piggy, ralph and jack merridewi believe that improvements could be to add a bit more detail to the character, maybe more symbolismLord of the FliesChapter 1 - CharactersPiggyThe first impression that I get of Piggy is as a...
Social Allegories in Lord of the Flies1006 words - 4 pages The Lord of the Flies if taken at face value can be taken as a short book about the struggle to stay alive on a deserted island and its physical and psychological influences on its residents. However, when the reader looks deeper, they see a story that is an allegory filled with rich and detailed imagery in almost all facets of the novel. An allegory is defined as a...
Lord Of The Flies1543 words - 6 pages How mankind can’t survive without rules and laws Could civilization live a normal and stable life, without any rules and orders to obey? Could you picture, New York City, with no laws to follow and everyone doing as they please? Just imagine the disasters that we will experience. In the novel, Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, we see how each individual character reacts differently to the exposure of...
Golding’s “Lord of the Flies”, emphasizes in the character Jack Merridew Essay Sample
By admin In Essay Samples On October 25, 2017
‘The subject ( of Lord of the Flies ) is an effort to follow the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. The moral is that the form of society must depend on the ethical mature of the person and non on any political system nevertheless seemingly logical or respectable. ’
— William Golding
In the fresh Lord of the Fliess by William Golding. Jack Merridew. head of the huntsmans. represents the concealed human passion and animate being inhuman treatment. The name Jack comes from Hebrew and means ‘one who supplants. ’ one who takes over by force. This is how Jack additions and uses power. While Ralph ( his challenger for the island ) . with Piggy and a few other kids. in contrast. represents ‘civilization’ and common sense. The name Ralph. is originally from the Anglo-Saxon linguistic communication. intending ‘counsel. ’ That is how Ralph works. he is an incarnation of democracy ; he is willing to be a leader but knows that it’s of import for each of the male childs to be able to talk their head.
At the beginning of the book the place of Jack and Ralph is more or less equal. They are both good – conditioned male childs of school age. who find themselves on a alone island with some other male childs of assorted age. but non older than themselves. They portion similar sentiments about their state of affairs and its solution. They both want to be rescued and taken place. They both realize that there are a batch of things they must make to last on the island until all of them get rescued. And in conclusion. they both are dominant types. but yet at the beginning of the novel they both acknowledge each other’s authorization and act to each other in a friendly manner.
At the return Ralph found himself entirely on a limb with Jack and they grinned at each other. sharing this load. Once more. acknowledge the zephyr. the cheering. the slanting sunshine on the high mountain. was shed that glamor. that unusual unseeable visible radiation of friendly relationship. escapade. and content.
-‘Almost excessively heavy. ’
Jack grinned back.
– “Not for the two of us. ’
Together. joined in attempt by the load. they staggered up the last measure of the mountain.
Together. they chanted One! ( 39 )
In the beginning of the book Jack was afraid of the blood. afraid of his knife. afraid of the Hunt. He was scared of killing hogs. scared of what he would go if he chose the way of decease and devastation.
“You cut a pig’s pharynx to allow the blood out. ” said Jack. “otherwise you can’t eat the meat. ”
“Why didn’t you- ? ”
They knew really good why he didn’t: because of the outrageousness of the knife descending and cutting into populating flesh ; because of the intolerable blood. ( 39 )
The first. although concealed struggle between Ralph and Jack. the struggle between the two sides. originate when Ralph was elected as the head. ‘the one who decides things’ . The reader is given the feeling from the writer that Jack’s amour propre has been lost. since Jack is used to being in charge. once being the chapter chorister and caput male child.
-‘I’m the main so. ’
The circle of male childs broke into hand clapping. Even the choir applauded ; and the lentigos on Jack’s face disappeared under a chagrin.
( 23 )
Thingss changed shortly after Ralph became main. Ralph unwisely appointed Jack as head of the huntsmans ( the leftovers of the former choir ) . therefore making a challenger for his power. Jack. painted his face and donned a ‘mask of a hunter’ . When you wear a mask you pretend you are a different individual. and so Jack did. he pretended he was a barbarian. Through the mask he accomplished killing the hog. though by painting his face. I think he sacrificed all moral moralss and values. He became a heathen. a huntsman. what we would go without moral and regulations of behavior. and queerly plenty he became a victim…
At first Jack and his huntsmans do what they are asked to. but as clip went on. they started to take part in different activities and neglect those needed for the interest of the boys’ redemption and emancipation from the island. One of these incidents was shortly before the jubilation of the first clip Jack slew the hog. The first clip Jack tasted the blood. experienced the bang of the pursuit and the possible wagess of the Hunt. While he had accomplished killing the hog. and conveying meat for the group ; he had neglected the fire and allow a ship base on balls them by. any possible saviors.
-‘You allow the fire out. ’
Jack checked. mistily irritated by this irrelevancy but excessively happy to allow it worry him.
-‘We can illume the fire once more. You should hold been with us. Ralph. We had a bang-up clip.
The twins got knocked over…’
-‘We hit the pig…’
– “…I fell on the top…’
-‘I cut his pharynx. ’ said Jack. proudly… ( 70 )
In Golding’s novel the fire. as many other things. has a symbolic map. For Ralph and his followings. the lone manner how to acquire rescued was to maintain the fire combustion. Therefore. Ralph tried to implement the high quality of the fire onto others. When the fire. the symbol of sense. went out. it was because Jack and his huntsmans got carried off by their hunting passion. which more and more dulls their ‘natural’ human sense. They let the fire out. right when a ship passes by ; this minute emphasizes the significance of the fire and the abysmal difference between human common sense and heads influenced and dulled by avidity ; in this instance it is their avidity for hunting.
The knife. on the other manus. has a wholly different symbolic significance. For Jack and his cortege it represents the Hunt. which finally leads to decease. which it besides symbolizes. Jack tries to act upon the knife and the Hunt onto others by beastly force. by painting their faces and making a mask of misrepresentation. This was effectual. because they believed that when they wore a mask they were different people. so they could kill whoever and do whatever. It is the bang of the Hunt. that the knife represents. that is responsible for Jack going a dictator and a autocrat. When you remove the knife. the mask. and the Hunt. from Jack. you get Ralph. Possibly if the Hunt had non consumed Jack. things would hold been different on the island.
Thingss took a honkytonk for the worst with the outgrowth of the animal. The animal represents the fright of adult male. the frights and biass that occur when one doesn’t understand or frights something or person. But the male childs. except for Simon. believed that the animal was manifested in a physical signifier that they could kill. and they wanted to make so. Jack played against their frights. and their biass against the animal like a marionette maestro and gained great position in their eyes when he offered to run the animal down. He mutinied against Ralph by stating he was a coward like Piggy. He divided the group into two for good. dividing his huntsmans. from Ralph’s kin.
“I’m non traveling to play any longer. Not with you. ”
Most of the male childs were looking down now. at the grass or their pess. Jack cleared his pharynx once more.
“I’m non traveling to be portion of Ralph’s lot-“
He looked down along the right – manus logs. totaling the huntsmans that had been a choir.
“I’m traveling off by myself. He can catch his ain hogs. Anyone who wants to run when I do can come excessively. ” ( 127 )
The bulk of Ralph’s few staying Alliess left him to fall in Jack’s party. What could Ralph offer them anyhow? To guard the fire. how were they. kids all aged under twelve old ages old. to understand the importance of the fire? Jack could offer them the bang of the Hunt. meat every dark. and possibly most significantly freedom from such duty.
What I find interesting about the undermentioned paragraph. is how God – like Jack appears. It is obvious he is in control here. sitting on a throne – like log. Painted and garlanded. like a heathen God being worshipped by his toadies. Offering others to pay court to him and partake in the beebread. their ‘God’ will supply for them.
Before the party had started a great log had been dragged into the centre of the lawn. and Jack painted and garlanded. sat there like an graven image. There were hemorrhoids of meat on green foliages near him. and fruit. and coconut cells full of drink. ( 149 )
Jack was speedy to kill all those who would ne’er ally themselves with him. and coerce the remainder to fall in him. Ralph tries to hide himself so that Jack and the huntsmans can non happen him. Now that the whole island is mastered by the hunters’ inhuman treatment. Fortunately for Ralph. the rescue-party arrives ‘on time’ and all the male childs who remains on the island get rescued. Ironically. it is the fire started by the huntsmans to kill Ralph which attracts their saviors. Had it non been the fire that spread on the island. the male childs would likely hold ne’er been rescued. Here the importance of fire as a symbol of sense is consummated.
The fire reached the coconut thenar by the beach and swallowed them noisily. A fire. apparently detached. swung like an acrobat and licked up the thenar caputs on the platform. The sky was black. The officer grinned cheerfully at Ralph.
-‘We saw your fume. What have you been making? Having a war or something? ’
Ralph nodded. ( 201 )
The fresh Lord of the Flies is every bit much a political narrative as it is anything else. it tells the narrative of the war between democracy and absolutism. and the maltreatment of power. it tells the narrative of World War II. Though it tells this in such a fast – traveling and exciting composing manner. that it is difficult for the reader to detect this until after much rereading and contemplation.
The island puting plants as a metaphor for the universe at the clip. the reader must maintain in head Golding wrote the Lord of the Flies in 1954. shortly after World War II. The male childs were trapped on the island. as people were trapped in Germany. France and other states politically and economically involved in World War II. What happens there becomes a commentary for the universe at the clip.
Jack. represents a Hitler – like dictator. he believes in commanding the island through beastly force. and governs the island through his reserves of huntsmans ; through autocratic power. As with Hitler. and about every dictator. Jack grew from the common frights of the multitudes. in this instance the fright of the animal. and the inability of Ralph to slake this fright.
Ralph. and his kin. portray the allied forces ; they believe in regulating the island through democracy. As in the instance of the allied forces. they won. but they had to give the lives of Piggy and Simon to carry through it.
In my sentiment. I think that Jack was possibly the most of import character in the book. he represented the ‘dark side’ . adding a mildly bitter gustatory sensation that blended absolutely with the secret plan. Had he non been in the book. their would non be a sense of daunting of fright. He was the Brutus in Julius Caesar. He was a necessary immorality.
Ironically. the same could be applied for Adolf Hitler. if it had non been for his distorted racial biass. could we genuinely have learnt so much about anti – semitism and racism?
We specialize in writing essays
Forget about that homework for less than $13.90/page